Tesla reportedly using 3D printed sand molds for ‘gigacasting’ large auto parts

Read Time:3 Minute, 4 Second
An auto part printed out of sand using binder jetting (Image Source: ExOne)
Binder jetting is used to print an auto part from sand (Image source: ExOne).

Sources familiar with Tesla’s production plans have revealed that the company is working on using binder jetting, a special 3D printing technique, to create the sand molds needed for its ‘gigacasting’ process, where a large, complex part such as the underbody is cast as a single piece of metal. 3D-printed molds will save time and money, and allow for more complex designs.

Anyone remotely familiar with 3D printing technology knows its biggest appeal: the ability to design and prototype multiple iterations of a part quickly and at low cost. Tesla, known as a company that uses disruptive approaches to solve production challenges, seems to have taken note of these benefits. Recently, we reported about its new ‘gigacasting’ process, which involves casting large, complex car parts as a single piece, instead of stamping and assembling it in several complex and costly steps. Sources behind the news revealed the difficulties of implementing this new process. It appears that 3D printers are at the heart of the solution.

Image Source: ExOne
Image Source: ExOne

The sand molds needed to cast large parts are too expensive to produce. Each one can cost as much as 4 million dollars, and each modification adds another $100,000. According to the sources, Tesla has been exploring a 3D printing technique called binder jetting to develop these molds. Binder jet printers use industrial sand to create a 3D shape. A liquid binder is applied in layers according to the digital design. This is similar to selective laser sintering (SLS), except that a binder agent is used instead of melting to turn the powder into a solid shape.

An ExOne printer being used to create sand molds (Image Source: ExOne)
ExOne’s ExOne printer is used to make sand moulds (Image source: ExOne).
De-sanding a finished print (Image Source: ExOne)
De-sanding an finished print (Image source: ExOne).

Each print only takes a few hours. This allows for prototypes to be tweaked many times. The cost of the whole design validation cycle, however, is only 3% of that of conventional methods. This reduces the time required for development from up to one year to as little as two or three. Tesla plans to leverage another important strength of 3D printing, the possibility of greater complexity in the model, since large structural parts often feature hollow voids to reduce weight and improve crash-performance.

Notably, BMW and Cadillac have already incorporated binder jetting into their development pipeline, using printers from Voxeljet. Similar machines are offered by Desktop Metal’s ExOne. While significant challenges remain in bringing gigacasting to the factory, with Tesla still working out the details, it’s safe to say that 3D printing continues to facilitate innovation across industries in new and unexpected ways.

Buy the ANYCUBIC Photon Mono X2 resin 3D printer on Amazon

Share our article – every link counts!

0 0
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %